RE: Crazy like a troll?


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks

RE: Crazy like a troll?

by Fastolfe (Vicar)

on Oct 26, 2000 at 20:15 UTC ( [id://38654]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Crazy like a troll?

Perhaps troll posts like this should simply be deleted.

Update: Why is this node being consistently down-voted? Are people reading it without context? I am trying to say that perhaps instead of allowing posts that are known trolls to persist and rack up negative reputation, the post itself should simply be deleted, thus preventing the problem that was being described. What is so bad about that concept? If you disagree, let's hear why.

Comment on RE: Crazy like a troll?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

RE: RE: Crazy like a troll?
by PsychoSpunk (Hermit) on Oct 26, 2000 at 23:25 UTC

Fastolfe

Perl?

But, OTOH, this makes vroom's life more complex since he would have to be vigilant to the threat of trolling posts. (vroom in this context may or may not consist of multiple editors with vroom-like power to remove trolling posts.) It is the whole argument of the /. v trolls issue or the possibility of crying homework. I'm for removing trolled nodes, but beyond something as blatant as Perl?, who decides to pull the plug?

ALL HAIL BRAK!!!

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion