Re: Perl vs. PHP


go ahead... be a heretic
	PerlMonks

Re: Perl vs. PHP

by perrin (Chancellor)

on Aug 13, 2004 at 19:05 UTC ( [id://382800]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Perl vs. PHP

Your PHP complaints are far too low-level. The big problem with PHP is that it has essentially no way to encapsulate things or share code safely. See this article for more.

Comment on Re: Perl vs. PHP

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Perl vs. PHP by nikos (Scribe) on Aug 13, 2004 at 19:36 UTC
what about php5? they've added a nice class support.	[reply]
Re^3: Perl vs. PHP by perrin (Chancellor) on Aug 13, 2004 at 20:00 UTC
Classes are better, but they still have no namespaces. Everything is in one global namespace.	[reply]
Re^4: Perl vs. PHP by adrianh (Chancellor) on Aug 14, 2004 at 10:34 UTC
Classes are better, but they still have no namespaces. Everything is in one global namespace. Just being devils advocate for a minute: How is this different from Perl? Perl mangles the package and class concepts together - it doesn't really have namespaces either (in the sense they are used in C#, C++, Smalltalk, etc.)	[reply]
Re^5: Perl vs. PHP by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 14, 2004 at 16:48 UTC
Re^6: Perl vs. PHP by adrianh (Chancellor) on Aug 14, 2004 at 17:45 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here

In Section Meditations

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://382800]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others browsing the Monastery: (3)

As of 2024-04-25 12:01 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found