|
in reply to Other programming language I most often use
What, no Assembler? :) Well, ideally perl monks should
not have to deal with that, but I do software for new
computer chips. I find myself programming in equal parts
C, Java, and assembler, depending on the scope of the task,
with as much Perl as I can fit in.
-Ted |
RE: Assembler?...
by swiftone (Curate) on Oct 23, 2000 at 22:22 UTC
|
You should write an assembler in Perl, that accepts dumbed down perl syntax. :)
| [reply] |
|
|
Great idea, why don't I do that...
perl -e '$/ = ""; eval <STDIN>;'
That wasn't so hard. :)
-Ted
| [reply]
[d/l] |
|
|
Oh, I thought you wanted a perl program that could
simulate running assembler programs. :) Outputting assembler
is definitly non-trivial. I wonder if it could fit in 512
bytes, so I could submit it to the obfuscated perl contest...
-Ted
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
That doesn't output assembler, which I assume you wanted. I was talking about a perl->assembly converter (since my main complaint with assembler is readability, even with m4 codes)
| [reply] |
|
