Re^2: "Off Topic" nodes


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks

Re^2: "Off Topic" nodes

by CountZero (Bishop)

on Jul 25, 2004 at 15:49 UTC ( [id://377277]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: "Off Topic" nodes
in thread "Off Topic" nodes

All these other nodes are more than a year old and my suggestion is closest to what castaway (seconded by tye) suggested, but the discussion somehow fizzled out and was not followed-up, so I think I had a valid reason to bring it back up again, phrased slightly different.

CountZero

"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

Comment on Re^2: "Off Topic" nodes

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: "Off Topic" nodes by particle (Vicar) on Jul 26, 2004 at 17:09 UTC
a fair point. on the other hand, mentioning that you performed some research on the topic, and including related resources in your original post helps make people aware that your new take on this old issue is warranted. ~Particle accelerates	[reply]
Re^4: "Off Topic" nodes by CountZero (Bishop) on Jul 26, 2004 at 18:22 UTC
You are quite right, I should have done that, but it was the week-end and the sun was shining and I still had to do a lot of work and ... and ... and ... CountZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://377277]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (4)

As of 2024-04-19 21:53 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found