Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Choosing a Platformby hardburn (Abbot) |
on Jul 22, 2004 at 13:07 UTC ( [id://376557]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Most of your cons for Perl seem like problems of politics and viewpoints than real technical issues. Which means (perhaps obviously) you need to approach Perl acceptance as a political problem, not a technical one. Perl does have UML tools, though I personally am warry of automatic code generation. Source code is plaintext, not compiled for distribution. Tamper-prevention requires use of source filters. This issue has been discussed before. See Here is a commercial obfuscator. Update: Also, don't discount Python and Ruby. They have Apache modules that also allow fiddling with Apache's internals (though they don't seem to go quite as deep as mod_perl, at least in Apache2). People with a Java background may be much more satisfied with these languages. ----
In Section
Meditations
|
|