Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Request for new Q&A category: Testing?

by pfaut (Priest)
on Jun 22, 2004 at 16:33 UTC ( #368781=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Request for new Q&A category: Testing?

I believe the keyword nodelet was intended to allow for user categorization of nodes but the search by keyword function was never implemented. This might be a better way of aggregating content than creating new sections for every hot topic. Maybe you can convince some ambitious pmdev to create the search functions.

90% of every Perl application is already written.
dragonchild
  • Comment on Re: Request for new Q&A category: Testing?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Request for new Q&A category: Testing? (keywords)
by tye (Sage) on Jun 22, 2004 at 17:18 UTC

    The keyword nodelet was probably added with that in mind, but as it stands, it isn't particularly useful for much other than as a way to anonymously add words to nodes, often insulting ones. Thankfully, it is mostly ignored so far.

    For it to be less abused, it would need to be subject to moderation (make adding keywords a level power, show who added each keyword, and allow voting on keywords). However, I doubt keywords would become verywhere1 enough that they'd become very useful.

    Therefore, I think the best thing to do with the keyword nodelet is to delete it. But if someone wants to enhance keywords as described, then I'll add searching based on them and we can see if any keywords become useful. (:

    - tye        

    1 Update: I replaced "ubiquitous" since "ubiquitous enough" probably bothers some pedants. I replaced it with "verywhere" which is like "everywhere" but not quite as much. Thanks to diotalevi for (accidentally, I think) coining this useful word.

      I had been looking at the current keyword stuff (before my 2 weeks off anyway), with a view to making it moderated etc. I might actually do it, unless someone else gets there first ;) I agree that the current implemenation is pretty useless..

      C.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://368781]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2020-10-30 13:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:












    Results (279 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?