Re: Re: Re: Recommended modules for Parent-Child trees?


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks

Re: Re: Re: Recommended modules for Parent-Child trees?

by stvn (Monsignor)

on May 18, 2004 at 13:51 UTC ( [id://354265]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: Recommended modules for Parent-Child trees?
in thread Recommended modules for Parent-Child trees?

Hero Zzyzzx

Here is another article by the same author (actually it somwhat seems to be a longer version of the same). You have to scroll through the first sections of each article to get to the "Tree's in SQL" stuff.

Part one of the article ...

http://www.dbmsmag.com/9603d06.html

Then part two of the article ...

http://www.dbmsmag.com/9604d06.html

and the third part ...

http://www.dbmsmag.com/9605d06.html

Enjoy.

-stvn

Comment on Re: Re: Re: Recommended modules for Parent-Child trees?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Recommended modules for Parent-Child trees?
by Hero Zzyzzx (Curate) on May 18, 2004 at 14:41 UTC

Jeez. 1996 that thing was written. Almost makes me wish I had a computer science degree. Besides complexity (like that's something to put aside) a nested set tree model really seems the way to go in my case.

I fear my hubris is getting the best of me, but I think I'm going to be writing a new DBI-backed module. . .

-Any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from doubletalk.

My Biz

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom