Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re: Re: Jump to head

by hv (Prior)
on May 16, 2004 at 12:15 UTC ( #353762=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Jump to head
in thread Jump to head

Yes please, I'm always doing this - hit preview, then want to go back and compare my response against the original node, or against the rest of the thread. I end up having to go search for the title.


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Jump to head
by ysth (Canon) on May 16, 2004 at 18:39 UTC
    I try to always start replies in a new window for this reason.
Re^3: Jump to head (replying to)
by tye (Sage) on May 16, 2004 at 21:02 UTC

    I just do "File -> New window" then Back.

    A "replying to" link would be useful so long as it specifies target="_new". Otherwise, we'll increase people getting burned by clicking on something during a preview and coming Back to find that your browser no longer displays your previewed content from the cache.

    This and similar behavior became so annoying that I've set IE to "never" expire cached content (which is also annoying but still preferable).

    - tye        

      I don't like spawning new windows. IMHO, HTML targets shouldn't ever spawn new windows. Most of the time us Mozilla-philes want no part of new windows, hence why tabbed browsing is so cool. And yep, I do instinctively open nearly everything in a new tab -- I hate it when a link is javascript or something and it doesn't want to act like normal HTML.
        And yep, I do instinctively open nearly everything in a new tab

        Then what do you care what the default target is? In a reasonable browser, requesting that a link be opened into a tab should open it in a tab even if target="_new" is the suggested default behavior in the HTML of the link. This is how my copy of Mozilla behaves.

        I hate it when a link is javascript or something and it doesn't want to act like normal HTML

        I was not considering javascript nor indeed anything other than HTML.

        So the suggested feature would only affect you when you forget to open the link in a new tab. In that case, would you rather have a new window pop up which you can just close if it bothers you, or have the in-process preview be replaced by a new page with the risk that going "Back" doesn't restore your text from the browser cache and the node contents that you were composing are simply lost?

        I don't find that design decision at all difficult (and I particularly dislike target="_new" in most cases).

        Further, for this particular use, I'd find jumping between two tabs (only one of which can be visible at once) to be the wrong way to consult a thread while I was composing a reply to it. So, even if I were in the habit of opening links into tabs, in this particular case I'd make an exception and open a new window so I could view the original node while I'm typing the reply.

        - tye        

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://353762]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (1)
As of 2023-03-21 03:55 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Which type of climate do you prefer to live in?

    Results (59 votes). Check out past polls.