Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Trojan Perl Distributionsby stvn (Monsignor) |
on May 06, 2004 at 21:23 UTC ( [id://351296]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Very little actually gets registered.... Yes, I am going through all this right now. I am trying to register one of my modules (Tree::Simple), the discussion seems slow and not many people seem interested in talking about it. I have recieved some comments that the name is not so good (which I agree with, but plain old "Tree" is already taken), but that is about all. Why then should one volunteer's work be slaughtered at some future date because another volunteer never got around to sanctifying it? I am not sure what you mean here? My problem is with the registered modules which seem to be either abandoned or just never got updated past 0.01. The best example of this I can find right now is Date::Time. It has not been updated from version 0.01, which was uploaded on March 2, 2000. The description itself says this: This is just some suggestions, as nothing is implemented yet. I'm open to critisism. Anyway I don't know if the original name will fit this module with all my plans....A code example then follows, but when I look at the source about all it does is declare two packages; Date::Time::UnixTime - which is totally empty, and Date::Time - which only had a 'new' method which does nothing but bless an empty hash. See for yourself here. It actually seems as if this author has moved on completely, leaving approx. 3 registered and partially finished modules.
-stvn
In Section
Meditations
|
|