![]() |
|
laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
RE: (jcwren) RE: regexp'sby princepawn (Parson) |
on Oct 03, 2000 at 18:03 UTC ( #35101=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
My GODthat is elegant. Too bad I can only ++ you one time on that one. This is one the most elegant things I have EVER seen, save for something merlyn did in Effective Perl programming:to determine if a scalar is a number (i may be slightly off on the actual expression)
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|