Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: CGI::Application vs CGI::Builder

by perrin (Chancellor)
on May 02, 2004 at 03:57 UTC ( [id://349738]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: CGI::Application vs CGI::Builder
in thread CGI::Application vs CGI::Builder

I would describe it more like C::A has studiously ignored both mod_perl 1 and 2. It is simply a well-behaved CGI program, which makes it easy to run under Apache::Registry and ModPerl::Registry.
  • Comment on Re: Re: CGI::Application vs CGI::Builder

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: CGI::Application vs CGI::Builder
by Anonymous Monk on May 03, 2004 at 08:29 UTC
    You can use CGI::Builder under Apache::Registry and ModPerl::Registry as well, exactly like you do with C::A.

    The Apache::CGI::Builder adds just some feature you might appreciate under mod_perl ;-)

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?

www.com | www.net | www.org
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://349738]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-19 19:40 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found