Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery?by Juerd (Abbot) |
on Mar 11, 2004 at 17:42 UTC ( [id://335894]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
(re downvoting) There's no interaction. The voting itself is interaction. It's an expression that the post was so bad, it doesn't merit a reply. Perhaps that is how you view downvotes. I do not. Usually when I downvote, I reply and tell what is wrong with the post (not saying anything about how I voted). UNLESS someone has already done so OR the post is just a stupid flame. And you think that a reply is too subtle? No, a reply is not subtle at all. They really need a vote? There is no question of *need* regarding XP or votes. Just so you know, I didn't vote on your posts. But you do know what I think about them, don't you? I can guess. You choose how you vote. I'm not saying any voting strategy is bad, as long as you vote for nodes, not people. You chose not to vote, I chose to vote. We both have our reasons for doing (or not doing) so. One of the reasons I vote for most replies is that I have plenty of votes to cast. Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|