Re: Re: Re: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery? (no)


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re: Re: Re: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery? (no)

by theorbtwo (Prior)

on Mar 11, 2004 at 12:17 UTC ( [id://335776]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery? (no)
in thread Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery?

year            upvotes downvotes %down
1999            224777  0         0.00%
2000            236449  19107     7.48%
2001            941894  75235     7.40%
2002            1210138 113567    8.58%
2003            1208418 112785    8.54%
2004 (prorate)  1175263 121371    9.36%
2004 (real)     224777  23213     9.36%
[download]

(The 2004 data is prorated based on 70 of 366 days.)

Comment on Re: Re: Re: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery? (no) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery? (no)
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Mar 11, 2004 at 17:23 UTC

Thank you theorbtwo. Thats exactly the information ive always wanted but never actually thought of asking for. :-)

Could do one with the same data plus the number of voters, by month? That would show almost what I would like to see which is the proportion of votes cast by what level (at the time of the vote). Which i guess is impossible?

---
demerphq

_{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

-- Gandhi}

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion