Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
I'm working through Hall and Schwartz's Effective Perl Programming: Writing Better Programs with Perl and had a small question about the passage below:
To a certain extent, idiom and style overlap. Some idioms, like print sort <>, are inarguable, but there are certainly gray areas:
foreach $key (sort keys %h) { print "$key: $h{$key}\n"; }
Print key-value pairs from %h one per line.
print map "$_: $h{$_}\n", sort keys %h;
Another way to print key-value pairs. The first example above is very plain Perl. It is efficient and readable and uses only basic features of the language. The second example is shorter and, some might argue, has a higher "cool factor" because it uses the nifty map operator and a list context in place of the mundane foreach loop in the first. However, you should consider yourself and your potential audience before leaving code like the second example for posterity, because it is definitely more obscure (but not that obscure) and might even be less efficient.
In my reading on perlmonks I've definitely noticed a bias towards the use of map and grep functions, and so I've been taking strides towards becoming more comfortable implementing them in my code (basic as it may be). Even so, I would like to understand in what ways the map version of the code above would be less efficient than the more verbose foreach loop? Is efficiency being sacrificed for the versatility/style of map? Is there a difference in efficiency at all? I assumed the two methods above to be interchangeable, but should I be being more selective of the situations where I use map?
The above segment is taken from Effective Perl Programming: Writing Better Programs with Perl By Joseph N. Hall, Randal L. Schwartz Publisher : Addison Wesley Pub Date : December 30, 1997 ISBN : 0-201-41975-0 and in no way my own.

In reply to Efficiency of map vs. more verbose basic/fundamental code by marquezc329

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-24 05:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found