comment on

Personally, when I've had occasion to fetch anything bigger than a few 10s of Kbytes on a regular basis, if prefer to shell out to wget.

It handles most protocols. It gives reliability with its ability to retry many times and pick up from where it left off when things go wrong. I can throttle the transfer if it is likely to impinge upon my other network activities. And has a myriad of other features if I need them.

As a bonus, it generally runs more quickly than my browser, LWP or any other tools I've tried.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

In reply to Re: Lazy URL question? by BrowserUk
in thread Lazy URL question? by pileofrogs

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks