We don't bite newbies here... much | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
The default behavior of Pod::Coverage when deciding what to look for (in _get_syms) is to ignore imported subroutines such as those generated for Moose attributes. So even though it sees the methods associated with the attributes, it drops them. Maybe Pod::Coverage could use a 'watchlist' argument for its constructor to explicitly specify methods that need pod entries even if they're imported from elsewhere. Then Pod::Coverage::Moose might be able to take advantage of that, sifting through class attributes to build an appropriate watch list based on those defined in the class rather than big meta-stuff like 'blessed' or 'confess'. 'IsMoose::cow'? On the watch list. 'IsMoose::meta'? Not on the watch list. The basic problem was reported as a regression a while back. I'll have to chew on this thought a little bit. In reply to Re: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?
by webfiend
|
|