comment on

Thanks for the quick response and information, I did make all the changes you recommended and it did not make a difference (please forgive any 'code' errors on the example, I had to extract it from our code and re-create it for the question due to a non-disclosure agreement.
As you can see, the first 'site' is nice, and the one I just added in my test is not (in fact the </sites> has also lost it's linefeed in the process.


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<config>
  <sites>
    <site>
      <sitename><![CDATA[www.example.com]]></sitename>
      <active><![CDATA[1]]></active>
      <rooturl><![CDATA[http://www.example.com.com/]]></rooturl>
      <name><![CDATA[Example]]></name>
    </site>
  <site><sitename>Test entry</sitename><name></name><rooturl><![CDATA[
+http://www.test.com.com/]]></rooturl><reportname><![CDATA[test report
+ name]]></reportname></site></sites>
</config>
[download]

Again, this is just a small section of many entries in this file.

In reply to Re^2: xml::libxml open, add and save not formatting properly by itsscott
in thread xml::libxml open, add and save not formatting properly by itsscott

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks