No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Sure, makes zen sense to me. You are overburdening the processor with the extra memory, which needs alot of housekeeping and searching.
I suspect there is an optimum memory size for each motherboard-cpu combo out there. A similar problem used to occur in older pentium-era computers back in the day. A motherboard may say it could handle 4 gig ram, but it ran faster with 1 gig. I think of it as a chef at a worktable. The chef can work faster with a small table, where everything is within arms reach.... and is definitely slowed down by a giant worktable.... the table (ram size) needs to be just the right size for the intended job. In reply to Re: Less is more? 40G memory twice as fast as 64G
by zentara
|
|