comment on

I can do the deed with

while (m/\+([0-9]+)[ACGTNacgtn]/g) { 
  print "diff+: $1\n";
  my $m = $1;
  s/\+[0-9]+[ACGTNacgtn]{$m}// 
}
[download]

But that's not quite so nice.

I understand that you meant “It's not so nice because I'd like a single regex”, but it's also not so nice because you're doing some work (matching the number and a single base) twice. You might prefer something like

s/\G\+$1[$bases]{$1}// while /(?=\+([0-9]+))/g;
[download]

which is at least 1 line, if 2 regexes. :-)

Here's a fairly naughty single-regex approach:

1 while s/(?<=\+)([0-9]+)[$bases]/$1 - 1/eg;
[download]

UPDATE: Changed the patterns to use look-around. Your version and my first will both loop forever on a mal-formed string like +2G, whereas the second one will just reduce it to +1 and terminate.
UPDATE: As Hena points out, I forgot a base case in my induction! The following fixes it (at least if no +0 strings are allowed), but loses a lot of the fun:

1 while s/\+([0-9]+)[aAgGcC]/$1 > 1 ? '+' . $1 - 1 : ''/eg;
[download]

In reply to Re: Regex fun by JadeNB
in thread Regex fun by Hena

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Don't ask to ask, just ask
	PerlMonks