comment on

because if you still follow use.perl - you will know that people have been abandoning it like a sinking ship.

Ambiguous antecedent detected on line 2: people are abandoning use.perl, perl, or perlmonks? UPDATE: Yes, seriously. I don't follow use.perl at all. I never really liked the site. Further, you could have meant perlmonks because stackoverflow continues to get more popular every day. You could have meant perl for all I know because people get really down on perl, not sure why.

Whatever. The test platform thing is very exciting.

-Paul

In reply to Re: No More Excuses For Not Testing Modules On Windows by jettero
in thread No More Excuses For Not Testing Modules On Windows by Limbic~Region

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


XP is just a number
	PerlMonks