![]() |
|
"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
How would you do this:
if a scalar context was implied by "${ ... }"? No. I can't think of a good use for it either :) But given you have scalar to force a scalar context, but no list to do the opposite, the status quo gives the greatest flexibility. Whether there is a good use for that flexibility it was (still is) too early to judge :) Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re: Why does foo() evaluate in array context in "${\foo()}"?
by BrowserUk
|
|