comment on

You have your list of choices. You can search for more, but the main point here is, choose what fits you best.

This may be common knowledge, but it's the absolute truth.

If Catalyst fits you, by all means, use it. I will condone it to no end, I will develop it as long as I'm able, and I will continue using it as long as my fingers are able to type. However, this doesn't mean that you *have* to use Catalyst. This doesn't even mean you have to use a perl framework. Some people are completely content with Ruby on Rails. I have my disagreements with it, but hey, if you can learn it inside out, and it matches your train of thought, God bless.

Try out a few, and see what really fits you. I've tried others, and found myself coming back to Catalyst each and every time. You'll be able to find the framework that's right for you in the dark, blindfolded.

meh.

In reply to Re: What is the Perl Web Framework du jour? by stonecolddevin
in thread What is the Perl Web Framework du jour? by crenz

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks