Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Possible answers:

  • Sorry; if I tell, Node_Reaper will hang me, upside down, in chains, in his deepest dungeon, until I'm as skeletal as he.
  • I don't recall whether I found the information on viewing original content in a thread or whether perhaps Corion mentioned it in the cb.

(BTW I just searched using terms such as "original content" or (by name, now that you know it's Corion's work) "xml" and didn't find the original.)

In any case, the line of code I offered for your Free Nodelet is literally and exactly what's in the third line of mine; viz:

This node's id: &#91;id://`id`] <br>[Nodes to consider] <br>[`id`.xml|Original content of `id`] ...

Now, back to your threshhold question:

My view is that "simply to flag them" (from Eric's, above, with which I gather you concur) is NOT enough. Yes, it's nice to know something has been changed, but unless one knows "from what" it doesn't solve the potential mysteries of the now-contextless replies.

Thus, I'm not sure that the magnitude of the coding work (by the PMDev's -- esp those with a better grasp of the guts of the Monastery) -- and the extra cost of retrieving and rendering by the server) is worth the effort.

And just FTR, Eric and I may not be in total agreement, but I do agree whole-heartedly with his remark, " There is no reason not to allow some updates, its specific types of updates that are harmful." It's just that I took your ideas as a springboard for a dscussion about ways to deal with the "harmful" ones, for those values of "harmful" which seem to me to detract from the value of the information here.

Update: But that may just reflect my feeling that it's good manners for those who come seeking help make the effort to observe our standards.

In reply to Re^5: Last modified date on nodes by ww
in thread Last modified date on nodes by Nkuvu

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (1)
As of 2021-12-04 02:21 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    R or B?

    Results (30 votes). Check out past polls.