Your skill will accomplish what the force of many cannot |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Hi blazar,
I agree with you that these are two different variable systems, and the implementation of lexicals is only half way... mainly because a lot of actions on packagevars are not possible with lexicals. But personally I prefer halfway to nothing! > OTOH not only do I cherish the way Perl 6 solves the issue by implementing lexical variables as package variables thus unifying the two systems into one, ... please, could you give me a link explaining this magical unification? My fantasy fails to imagine lexicals as package-vars ... or what exactly do you mean with "lexical variables as package variables" ??? OTH it shouldn't be that difficult to harmonize these two systems... eg. with something like a dynamic hash %PAD for the active block as equivalent to stashes like %main:: ! %PAD would replace the use of padwalker. Cheers LanX In reply to Re^5: Indirect variable name
by LanX
|
|