Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( [id://3333] : superdoc . print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

I apologize for not being to provide you with numbers, for I cannot locate the article I had in mind when I originally responded. VC far and above outsells even the closest competitor.

dws was kind enough to /msg me privately with similar thoughts, however, I ask you the same question I did him: how many Fortune 1000 companies do you know of that've standardized on gcc, as compared to the number that've standardized on VC?

As stupid as that sounds, (free vs. howevermuch Microsoft wants to charge you today), the point remains that MS is the best selling C++ compiler on the market. I'm not any more fond of that than you are, however, look at the numbers.

I think the one point you're not taking into account is that the people you hang out with know what they're doing. Many of the rest of us deal with PHB's, Mordac, and the rest of the Dilbertian personalities on a regular basis.

And, if you'll forgive me, this is something that many of you (collectively, not individually) fail to take into account. Open source may be the best thing since sliced bread, Unix may be a superior OS, and M$ make suck as hard as you wish to say in public. But, until you'll able to accept the fact that Windows is a reality and that openly accepting Windows developers is one of your best opportunities for expanding the useage of Perl, then you'll continue to be marginalized like Ralph Nader, who by refusing to endorse the candidate closest to him ensured the election of the one farthest from his view point.

If you truly want what is best for Perl, the community, and the people that want to use it, you will accept those with Windows blood in their veins and minimize your harping on their choice of careers or lack of "true faith," for denying them will only drive them to ASP, PHP or other technologies.

Dont' get me wrong; gcc is great, but...VC has more books on the shelves.


In reply to Re: Re (tilly) 2: Why Use Perl? by batmonk
in thread Why Use Perl? by Gremlin

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.