Welcome to the Monastery | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
So, if someone wanted to call the same method twice on the same object, you've managed to completely remove that ability. I guess you could do something like:
But, it doesn't seem like a very clean interface to me ... I mean, how can we tell what arguments should've been part of the object initialization, and what were arguments to the method call? Personally, I'm a user of SOAP::Lite, but I have a feeling that its history, having been created when SOAP was basically just a thin wrapper around XML RPC, was a problem, as almost all of the examples you find are these sorts of calls. I don't know that there is a good 'best practice' in how to deal with passing objects using SOAP::Lite. (if there is, I'd love to know about it myself) In reply to Re^3: SOAP Modules (OO or not?)
by jhourcle
|
|