Why would Stonhenge have more credibility than Brainbench?
The latter seems to be a legitimate company, whose focus happens
to be certification. If you mean because more people in the
Perl community have heard of Stonehenge than Brainbench,
you miss the point of certifications: being able to
demonstrate your technical ability to non-technical people,
via a standardized objective, third-party test. Not trying
to knock either company (I happen to think pretty highly
of them both), just pointing out that one having
more "credibility" than the other is a silly statement.
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|