Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Hi Anonymous Monk, I will go with 50 :-)
However, I also like the answer given by sulfericacid in Re: A script to determine the next number in a sequence. But as Limbic~Region said in Re: A script to determine the next number in a sequence: “For a given number of integers in a sequence, there are an infinite number of "formulas" that could produce that sequence.” This is why for your small dataset more than one answer is possible. Cheers Update: Added quote by Limbic~Region in attention to his comment in Re^2: A script to determine the next number in a sequence In reply to Re: A script to determine the next number in a sequence
by lin0
|
|