Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Dear Monks,
In "DATABASE ACCESS WITH DBIx::Class", the Catalyst Manual says, "Although Tony Bowden's Class::DBI has been the traditional Perl ORM (object relational mapping) engine, Matt Trout's DBIx::Class (abbreviated as "DBIC") has rapidly emerged as the Perl-based ORM technology of choice. Most new Catalyst applications rely on DBIC, as will this tutorial." As it happens I've always used CDBI and HTML::Template but Catalyst likes DBIC and Template Toolkit so I'm planning on doing the switchover. I don't mean to start a flamewar, but I'd like to know why. I've felt CDBI is too slow. Any monks with experience using both in or outside of Catalyst? Thanks. In reply to Why did DBIC overtake CDBI? by mattr
|
|