Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
So, I've been here for a while and I'm used to the site's quirks. I like quirks. 'Stumbit' is cute. But I'm not crazy about the choices for Nodes to Consider; Right now they are and after a while I've learned that if we're not being asked to delete (reap) something, we're being asked to approve an edit (add code tags, fix title, and so forth) or move a node. It would be a little less confusing, in particular for a node move (which requires a yes/no answer), if the choices were something like this: either explicitly (as above) or implicitly (perhaps by updating the documentation). It just goes against the grain (briefly) when I have to approve a node move by clicking on 'edit'. Alex / talexb / Toronto "Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds In reply to Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by talexb
|
|