good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Sure, but I've seen in the PAR documentation that it has some heuristic to decide which modules to include; this could be useful in your case, I think, because I hope they've already worked out the problem of eliminating modules that are distributed together with Perl, saving you time to reproduce such a behaviour.
Update: I now see that the heuristic comes from Module::ScanDeps (this is in pp documentation). Flavio (perl -e 'print(scalar(reverse("\nti.xittelop\@oivalf")))') Don't fool yourself.In reply to Re^3: How do you audit what Perl modules you use?
by polettix
|
|