comment on

I appreciated the opportunity to see such an interesting debate and I would have missed it had I not been in time to see the posting.

I can appreciate people not wanting their words struck in stone due to the topic being somewhat controversial. But the discussion was lively and the arguments were well-formed, if we fired up a meditation with the same subject it would not be nearly as good in content.

If vroom does take off jptxs's points I shall blow 7 points, tomorrow voting for jptxs's things and to prove that I am redressing an inbalance I percieve I won't even read the postings! (at least not until afterwards).

I am certain that the points will stay as whilst this was a faux pas it is not a punishable one.

It is a shame that the post was not okayed as it was very interesting.

--

Brother Frankus.

In reply to Hrmph by frankus
in thread Java vs. Perl from the CB (no CB log included) by jptxs

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks