There are little differences between the Bug-zilla and RT. The main ones, AFAIK, are that Bug-zilla does not have an email-based interface to update / create requests, and RT have a nice interface for this.
Also, RT offers an interface to customization and the possibility of maintaining multiple queues (for lines or families of products, for example) and Bugzilla keeps an individual bug list.
As a final consideration, Bugzilla and RT have different bug-management paradigms: Bugzilla uses "there is no bug without an owner" and RT uses "There are Requests, even if there is no person to solve them". I think RT's approach is more generic, what is a Good Thing(TM).
In your place, I would start with RT and, if I found that this is more than I need to solve the bug-tracking problem, I would switch to Bugzilla (or any other).
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|
