comment on

I am tired of seeing Perl vs. PHP nodes. Haven't we discussed this to death already?

Obviously PHP's popularity bothers certain monks. Deal with it.

PHP is easier to learn and can be teached in high scholls.

I am not a good speller, but your misspelling is too funny to ignore. And what's wrong with PHP being easier to learn than Perl? Many people think Ruby is easier to learn than Perl, but you don't hear Perl hackers complaining about it. Oh wait, Ruby is not as popular as PHP. What a bunch of whiners.

In reply to Re: Perl vs. PHP by jacques
in thread Perl vs. PHP by nikos

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks