I agree completely with BlaisePascal
's criteria. In general,
I vote something up if I find it interesting, informative or
insightful. This means that even non-perl-related discussion
will get ++ from me if I think I learned something from it.
I also rarely vote --, and only when the post is completely
irrelevant, gratuitously agressive, or very badly formulated.
This means that a Perl question may get voted down, because it's
phrased like "I don't know what the problem is -please help me"
followed by 300 lines of code. Extra bad if the code is not
enclosed in CODE tags.
As to "this community's ideals", I would say that the answer
is in the word "community". We came here because of Perl,
but we are all individuals with different experiences, opinions
and interests, not all of them Perl-related. You learn as much
in just chatting with other people as in reading deep technical
posts. So IMHO, it's OK to get off-topic or philosophical
every once in a while if it helps in fostering our spirit of
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
Want more info? How to link or
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.