comment on

Hmm, I was going for something like this at first. But certain critics on the test server really didnt like the inline version, and as they were my only participating commentors I went with their opinion.

I think what I'll do is wait a bit for some more replies and comments and then do my damndest to make everyone happy at once. Which means some folks, like yourself, will have to wait a touch for your itch to be scratched. But be assured it will get scratched.

Btw, please consider what this will look like when there are 10 sections involved... The inline version looked ok with one line, started getting really crowded at two lines and looked pretty bad at three lines. At least sufficiently bad that I decided that the comments of my critics at hand outweighed my own view.

---
demerphq

_{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

-- Gandhi}

In reply to Re: Re: Table of Contents in Newest Nodes (smaller!) by demerphq
in thread Table of Contents in Newest Nodes by demerphq

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks