P is for Practical | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
i think CGI::Application is great. Really great.
But I never use it. For similar reasons that you wrote Apllication::Pipeline. but heres the thing; I can write my own baseclass framework that suits my applications perfectly. And put in whatever handlers/plugins/doodahs i need, when i need them. Application::Pipeline seems like a pretty neat module; I am not dissing that at all. But I see a fundamental flaw with these "just add water" frameworks; the choice between:
update: what i mean is: IMO there is no happy medium between a simple or bloated "Application Framework". And the general mechanisms involved are too simple to appeal to compromise in the name of "Code-Reuse". In reply to Re: Bound for CPAN: Reviews Requested for Application::Pipeline
by Ctrl-z
|
|