I'd say No ... for the very reasons that have allready been expressed (and will likely be echoed by many more).
I would probably agree however that having a "Parrot" Section might be usefull in the not too distant future. While Parrot will be a big part of the Perl 6 Implimentatin, people with questions about the "Perl Language" will not neccessarily (all) care about "Parrot Language" questions.
(Part of me thinks that it shouldn't matter -- that PerlMonks doesn't need a Parrot section anymore then "C++Monks" needs a "MIPS" section. But the difference is that C++ can be compiled down to a wide variety of machine langauges, where as Perl6 will only ever be compiled down to Parrot, so the communities are going to be a little more tightly bound.)
In reply to Re: SOP6W
by hossman
in thread SOP6W
by rir
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|