Not hard obviously ;-) However, I do miss the ability to say succinctly whether two things are the same "object" or not - something like Common Lisp's eq, Pop-11's == or python's is.
I admit Perl's eq works for this case 99% of the time, I don't like using it for identity checks because:
- It's not explicit enough. I want to say "these two things are the same" not "these two things expressed as strings are the same"
- Stringification has got to be more expensive than a direct comparison internally.
- It can fail when you have overloading of eq or "". I don't like writing code that can fail, even if it is only a few edge cases :-)
It's easy to write your own obviously - this does the job:
#! /usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Scalar::Util qw(refaddr);
sub same {
ref($_[0]) && ref($_[1]) && refaddr($_[0]) == refaddr($_[1])
|| refaddr(\$_[0]) == refaddr(\$_[1]);
};
use Test::More 'no_plan';
our ($x, $y, $z) = (1,1);
*z = *x;
ok same($x, $x), 'x is x';
ok same(\$x, \$x), 'ref x is ref x';
ok !same($x, $y), 'x not y';
ok same($x, $z), 'x is z';
But, in my opinion, something this basic should be in the base language... but I guess that's what perl6 is for :-)
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.