comment on

All of my notes were published in the good faith, and with the implicit intent that they be distributed with no restrictions, freely, no strings attached, to the benefit of anyone seeking education.

Ehm... What?

In what way do you perceive an https-only site to be more restricted, less free, and/or having strings attached?

The only thing I can think of would be if you object to the site saying "you must use this specific protocol (https) to access the site's content", but requiring the https protocol is no different in that respect than requiring the http protocol. Both are widely supported in pretty much any software you might want to use to access the site - you can even get telnet clients with TLS support if you feel requiring the use of a dedicated web browser to be too restrictive.

In reply to Re: End of HTTP? by dsheroh
in thread End of HTTP? by oiskuu

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks