comment on

IMHO

I think the real problem is using Test::More as a debugger

I get how easy it is to start using testing modules for everything

I get wanting document every debugging session , every development milestones,

but doing it in one file is bad habit, as is doing it using testing modules , the modularity of your API suffers if there is no separation between testing and development

the solution is smaller and smaller teeny tiny test files, like bug specific rt-666.t bug-frobnitz.t, even if 80%-99% of each test file are identical save for the input/output

but if you're gonna debug learn the API :) https://metacpan.org/pod/Test::More#Diagnostics

Update: Link fixed by GrandFather

In reply to Re: Quieting Test::More (purpose, diag) by Anonymous Monk
in thread Quieting Test::More by stevieb

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
	PerlMonks