It looked like my anchors and column settings were no longer valid. Not being an expert (or even a novice) in such things, I assumed it was an issue with HTML5. I'll take formatting suggestions if you've got any...

well, perlmonks advertises html4 not html5

I don't really have any recommendations, to me it looks fine in my tests with and without the colgroups

Also, I don't see any actual anchors, you have commented out links, but no corresponding anchors like go here link

h1

h2

h3

h4

You are here anchor

like <a href="#go here">go here link</a>
<h1>h1</h1> <h2>h2</h2> <h3>h3</h3> <h4>h4</h4>
<a name="go here">You are here anchor </a>
[download]

In reply to Re^6: True or False? A Quick Reference Guide by Anonymous Monk
in thread True or False? A Quick Reference Guide by bobf

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

comment on

h1

h2

h3

h4