Also note that at NO point did the OP indicate any aversion to using existing packages
Apparently you didn't even read the title: without All-In-One Modules from CPAN.
we'll let the peanut gallery judge who in this thread is deathly afraid of being occasionally wrong about stuff.
Really? Is that what you think? Wrong again. Take a look: http://perlmonks.com/?node_id=3989;BIT=Sorry.;a=browseruk;Wi;M
I'm just bored with YAA; who's made zero attempt to talk to OP.
Had you put as much effort into trying to help the OP; as you have trying to prove that split isn't the only way to tackle the problem(*); you'd have achieved something worthwhile.
As is, all you've done is waste everyone's time.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.I'm with torvalds on this Agile (and TDD) debunked I told'em LLVM was the way to go. But did they listen!
In reply to Re^15: Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise)