Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
see also Indirect Object Syntax by Bod from (working class) Coventry, UK. Around here they call me posh as I hail from Warwick. Only 14 miles distance geographically but a world apart if the British class system still existed! new Foo has two barewords Is new not a keyword that Perl understands without any context other than a module name will follow? So, to ensure I do understand... Is it OK to condense that down to this and avoid the intermediate variable definition? Are the brackets necessary as the -> operator explicitly tells Perl this is a method call?
Update: I've been reading this book and realised that new is not a keyword in Perl! It is just the name of a commonly used module method. Another little chunk of understanding falls into place... In reply to Re^2: Indirect Object Syntax
by Bod
|
|