Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
To be honest, I was surprised to find that it was still valid in v5.34 — thanks for the info. I had written, "I haven't used [it] in over 20 years"; upon reflection, I believe my last usage was probably in 1996 or 1997; so that's closer to a quarter of a century. The message, to which you linked, had "... $user's problem ...", followed by "This bites experts and new users alike ...". I suspect I could have been one of those bitten, if reviewing another's code without "use warnings;". In v5.28, a new warning was added: see "perl5280delta: New Warnings" and "perldiag: Old package separator used in string". My normal code would be something along these lines:
which, when run, gives me ample feedback:
I don't have anything earlier than v5.30 on that system:
However, on another OS:
Not quite as "ample" feedback. I expect I could work it out from here; others might be saying frustratedly: 'But there is no "user::s" in my code'. I read through about the first dozen NNTP messages. Most discussion seemed to be about whether removal should be partial or complete, and backward-compatibility. When I got to https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2021/08/msg261321.html and read "... disks of infinite size coming free with a packet of corn flakes ...", I had a chuckle and left it there. I wouldn't personally have any problem if the old style package separator was removed permanently and completely. — Ken In reply to Re^7: POD for use feature 'declared_refs' wrong
by kcott
|
|