Just another Perl shrine | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> I'd say it is an ORM, but ORM can refer to different architectural flavours,
Many thanks, that explains a lot. :) I'd rather call this an SQL abstraction. It's much like SQL::Abstract and allows to cover (almost?) all semantics of SQL queries. But yeah, like I said I'm strongly associating ORM to "Active Records" and the resulting limitations.
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re^2: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by LanX
|
|