![]() |
|
The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> I don't understand what of interest that's supposed to show.
The fact that [...] resolves each time to a new AV was used as argument against being literal. Obviously most "literals" are not treated the way constants are. (with the exception of undef)
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
by LanX
|
|