good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> That seems to be because a reference to a literal actually constructs a new scalar;
again more theories ... see how the ref to a real constant like a stays stable in Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) and please explain the difference to your allegedly constant 1 . > There is no such thing as a literal aggregate in Perl — the {} and [] operators are defined as constructors instead. Defined? ... Source?
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by LanX
|
|