![]() |
|
Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> compelling reason why they should be read-only.
Again, what is the compelling reason to throw an error with aliased 1 or "string" or undef??? The OP has an example. Same league, it's not more logical at all. Probably some implementation detail related to magic edge-cases like auto-vivification or so.
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by LanX
|
|