Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Maybe the PBX lost its clock? Sure it did. It has no RTC, or at least no battery backup.

Just a little update from my future self:

I rescued the fully-featured variant of my ISDN PBX from the garbage bin. This one has all the bells and whistles, supports ten instead of just six analog phones, supports a module to add a second external ISDN line and a second internal ISDN bus, supports a second door line module. But it is basically the same hardware as my PBX. My PBX just has a few components and connectors not mounted. I opened the rescued PBX and had a look around, and found "the usual suspects". And in a corner of the PCB, I found pads for a CR2032 battery holder and an eight pin RTC chip next to it.

So the hardware seems to support a hardware RTC including a battery backup. But at some time late in development, the manufacturer decided not to mount the RTC components and instead rely solely on the software and ISDN network features. That's more than just annoying!

On the other hand, the RTC battery would have been placed in an "unreachable" area of the case, locked behind sealed screws. So after about five to ten years, the battery would be drained and the PBX would either refuse to work or fall back to the current behaviour. To fix that, the manufacturer would have to re-layout the PCB to move the battery to the connectors area, or add another removeable cover to the case to allow access to the battery holder.

Removing the RTC and battery from the design allowed the PBX to work continously for more than twenty years. So after all, getting rid of the RTC and battery was probably a good idea.

Alexander

--
Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)

In reply to Re: OT: Stupid User Interfaces by afoken
in thread OT: Stupid User Interfaces by afoken

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-19 05:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found